|
Conceptual Research Corporation (CRC) is an aerospace design and research company with a primary focus
on the conceptual design of aircraft and spacecraft. CRC can develop a vehicle concept
to your requirements, analyze and optimize it, and then bring it
to reality through a multi-company partnership. CRC also provides engineering design reviews, methods
development, and training in aerospace vehicle design, and markets the
RDS-Professional aircraft design software. CRC is led by industry veteran
Dr. Daniel P. Raymer, well-known aircraft designer and author of
the leading aircraft design textbook. CRC services include:
Click here or on the picture to see some typical CRC projects. For further information or to request a quote for services, contactConceptual Research Corporation PO Box 5429, Playa del Rey, CA 90296 USA Phone: 310 577-3773 FAX: 818 743-7483 |
CRC works with the customer to define system requirements, then develops one or more concepts, conducts analysis, performs optimizations, and presents design reports and briefings. Projects can range from "quick-look" feasibility studies to a substantial effort by a CRC virtual company team including CFD, structural design, FEM, subsystems design, production design, and whatever else it takes to get the design to the desired level of maturity - including flight, if funding is available!
CRC can simply do a design study for you and then "walk away." Or, it can become intimately involved in your design effort,
interacting with your program management and engineering staff at any desired level ranging from consultation, to
an active design involvement, to acting as overall program manager and "doing it all". In this case CRC will bring
together and manage an appropriate subcontractor team for the project.
CRC can help by reviewing the new idea, assessing it versus existing technologies, and identifying
likely applications. Then CRC will design one or more notional vehicle concepts and perform trade studies to determine the benefits
of the idea. CRC will also prepare a technology maturation plan to bring the idea to an acceptable
Technology Readiness Level. For a better idea of CRC's approach in such studies, see Dr. Raymer's
Advice to Inventors.
CRC provides such Red Team design reviews, giving a confidential outside review of your design concept with focus on
risk reduction and design optimization. Usually these are performed on-site by CRC President
Dr. Daniel P. Raymer. Other subject experts may be brought in if appropriate.
For example, in May 1997 a two-day Red Team was conducted for Samsung Aerospace and the Korean Aeronautical Development Agency of the design concept for the
KTX-2 Supersonic Trainer project, now in production as the
T-50 Golden Eagle.
Samsung personnel presented briefings on design features and analysis
results and methods, and responded to questions by Dr. Raymer. The upper photograph at left shows the configuration at that time, the lower image is the
T-50 aircraft today. The nature of the questions and the content of the Red Team Final Report are, of course, confidential to the customer. Let it be said that the KTX-2 project at that time was found
to have been executed with a high degree of professionalism, creativity, and good engineering judgment, and that the design was credible, low risk, and
visually attractive. The report offered recommendations for further trade studies, risk reductions, and design enhancements.
Dr. Raymer recently served as expert witness/consultant in support of an aircraft design company in a lawsuit against a previous project teammate over an issue of intellectual property. Raymer reviewed all the technical data and wrote position papers which were provided to the Judge and his technical Special Master. Raymer sat next to the lead lawyer during testimony and cross-examination, passing notes with technical questions to ask of the other side's engineers and expert witness (a well-known retired Vice President of a major aerospace firm). At one point the lead lawyer told Raymer, "Thank goodness you've arrived - we knew we had the facts on our side but you've been able to pull the team together by bridging the gap between us lawyers and the engineers with all their technical talk." In the end, the technical judgment validated the positions that Dr. Raymer supported.



